Source: Christian Science Monitor (US)
Author: Peter N. Spotts, Staff Writer of The CSM
Published: March 24, 2006 Edition
Copyright: 2006 The Christian Science Monitor
Contact: oped@csps.com
Website: http://www.csmonitor.com/
Arctic temperatures near a prehistoric level when seas were 16 to
20 feet higher, studies say.
Global warming appears to be pushing vast reservoirs of ice on
Greenland and Antarctica toward a significant, long-term meltdown.
The world may have as little as a decade to take the steps to avoid
this scenario.
Those are the implications of new studies that looked to climate
history for clues about how the planet's major ice sheets might
respond to human-triggered climate change.
Already, temperatures in the Arctic are close to those that thawed
much of Greenland's ice cap some 130,000 years ago, when the planet
last enjoyed a balmy respite from continent-covering glaciers, say
the studies' authors.
By 2100, spring and summer temperatures in the Arctic could reach
levels that trigger an unstoppable repeat performance, they say.
Over several centuries, the melt could raise sea levels by as much
as 20 feet, submerging major cities worldwide as well as chains of
islands, such as the present-day Bahamas.
The US would lose the lower quarter of Florida, southern Louisiana
up to Baton Rouge, and North Carolina's Outer Banks. The ocean would
even flood a significant patch of California's Central Valley,
lapping at the front porches of Sacramento.
These estimates may understate the potential rise. The teams say
their studies provide the first hints that during the last
interglacial period, ice sheets in both hemispheres worked together
to raise sea levels, rather than the Northern Hemisphere's ice
alone. This raises concerns that Antarctic melting might be more
severe this time, because additional melt mechanisms may be at work.
"It sounds bad," acknowledges Jonathan Overpeck, a University of
Arizona researcher who led one of the two studies. He notes that
rising temperatures are approaching a threshold. But "we know about
it far enough in advance to avoid crossing it." The challenge, he
and others say, is to take advantage of the remaining window by
reducing emissions of greenhouse gases substantially.
The two studies were published in Friday's issue of the journal
Science.
Ice on Greenland and Antarctica is already thinning faster than it's
being replaced - and faster than scientists thought it would, notes
Richard Alley, a paleoclimatologist at Penn State University and
member of one of the research teams. Only five years ago, he notes,
climate scientists expected the ice sheets to gain mass through
2100, then begin to melt. "We're now 100 years ahead of schedule,"
he says.
The new results aren't the end of the story. The researchers will
refine the models, improve the measurements, and find other sources
of data to verify the modeling. Coral data pointing to sea-level
changes in the last warm period remain controversial, the team
acknowledges. And the team's assumption that the amount of carbon
dioxide would triple by 2100, although moderate among climate
forecasts, is not a done deal. It depends on how quickly industrial
and developing countries adopt low-emission technologies and take
long-term steps to reduce greenhouse gases.
But the window for action is relatively short, Dr. Overpeck says.
CO2 remains in the atmosphere for more than a century after it's
first emitted. And it takes time to implement policies and adopt
technologies. Thus for all practical purposes, the tipping point may
come sooner than atmospheric chemistry would suggest.
The studies required some in-depth sleuthing. Researchers realized
that changes in Earth's tilt and orbit intensified the sunlight
reaching the Arctic during interglacial periods, notes Bette Otto-
Bliesner, a scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric
Research in Boulder, Colo. But when it came to the effect on the
Arctic's ice, "no one knew how big the response would be."
So she and her colleagues first tested the center's newest climate
model against temperature information gleaned from pollen, insects,
ocean plankton, and other remnants of the period. The results
matched closely.
Confident that they could reproduce the period's climate by
computer, they linked the results to a second model with a
reputation for accurately simulating ice sheets. Using ice-core
samples and other evidence as a reality check, they concluded that
within 1,000 to 2,000 years of the warming's onset, Greenland's ice
sheet dwindled to a steep lump covering the island's central and
northern parts. The melt water raised sea levels by seven to 11
feet.
But coral records from geologically stable parts of the ocean
suggested that sea levels during that time rose 16 to 20 feet - a
level that held for roughly 11,000 years. Overpeck, who had been
working with Dr. Otto-Bliesner on the initial modeling exercise,
says several lines of evidence led him to suspect that the balance
came from Antarctica.
From there, the team used the climate model to estimate the warming
that could occur by 2130 if CO2 emissions rose by 1 percent per
year. In the pantheon of emissions scenarios, this represents a
moderate one, he holds. But it's enough to triple CO2 concentrations
by 2100, leading to summers that are 5 to 8 degrees F. warmer than
today - levels that appear to have melted the ice 129,000 years ago.
Since the beginning of time, the Earth
has been warmed by sunlight beaming
down through the insulating blanket
of the atmosphere.
That blanket, made up of carbon dioxide,
water vapor, ozone, methane and nitrous oxide,
traps heat on the Earth from the sun's energy,
creating what is called the Greenhouse Effect.
An Arctic Alert on Global Warming
Source: Christian Science Monitor (US)
Author: Peter N. Spotts, Staff Writer of The CSM
Published: November 09, 2004 Edition
Copyright: 2004 The Christian Science Monitor
Contact: oped@csps.com
Website: http://www.csmonitor.com/
Global warming is heating the Arctic at a rapid pace - with impacts that could range from the disappearance of polar bears' summer habitat by the century's end to a damaging rise in sea levels worldwide.
That assessment, released Monday by a group of international climate experts, amounts to one of the most urgent warnings on climate change to date, and could put new pressure on the US and other nations to curb fossil-fuel emissions.
This comes at a time of growing concern about the effects of global warming, which scientists generally agree is increasingly driven by rising carbon-dioxide levels in the atmosphere from human industrial activity and changing land-use patterns.
Monday's report called for "strong near-term action" to reduce output of gases that, when they rise into the atmosphere, trap heat in what is called the greenhouse effect.
The trends cited in the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment are stark:
• Rapid melting of Arctic glaciers, including the vast sheet of ice that covers Greenland. The sheet locks up enough fresh water to raise sea levels by as much as 27 feet over the course of several centuries. The group calculates that during this century, Greenland temperatures are likely to exceed the threshold for triggering the long-term meltdown of the island's ice sheet.
• Arctic temperatures rising up to twice as fast as the global average. Over the past 50 years, average winter temperatures in Alaska, western Canada, and eastern Russia have risen as much as 7 degrees F. Over the next century, temperatures are projected to rise by up to 13 degrees F.
• A dramatic reduction in the extent of the summer ice pack in the Arctic Ocean. Late-summer ice coverage already has declined by as much as 20 percent over the past three decades. The summer ice pack is projected to shrink by another 10 to 50 percent by the end of the century. Some climate models show the summer ice vanishing by 2040.
Either change could accelerate warming by allowing the ocean to absorb solar heat. The change could threaten species such as polar bears and some seals with extinction. Researchers also worry that an influx of fresh water into the North Atlantic could disrupt large-scale ocean currents worldwide, altering weather patterns and the locations where nutrients rise from the depths to support regional fisheries.
"The Arctic is warming now, at a faster rate than the rest of the planet. It's affecting people, and its effects are global," says Robert Corell, a senior fellow with the American Meteorological Society who chaired the team that pulled the study together.
Assembled over 4-1/2 years, the study came at the request of the Arctic Council and the International Arctic Science Committee. The council includes top-level government officials from the United States, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, and Sweden, as well as from six organizations representing indigenous groups who live in the Arctic region. Some 300 scientists from the world's top polar-research centers were involved.
The report details current and projected changes that could affect everything from shipping, agriculture, and the livelihoods of indigenous people to breeding grounds for migratory birds, many of which are considered endangered. One aspect on which researchers are keeping their eye: the release of methane and carbon dioxide as permafrost thaws and tundra decomposes. Even if the advance of forests to higher latitudes soaks up some of this released CO2, this still leaves methane - a much more potent greenhouse gas - free to enter the atmosphere.
Monday, the Pew Center on Global Climate Change issued its own study of global warming's effect on the US. The report largely focuses on warming's impact on ecology and biodiversity.
The Arctic study also comes at a time of growing momentum internationally to address the climate change.
Last week, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a bill passed by parliament that ratified the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. His signature was the final act required for the pact to take effect. The accord requires industrial countries party to the pact to reduce their CO2 emissions by an average of 5.5 percent between 2008 and 2012. While climate researchers agree that the pact's target will have little effect on atmospheric CO2, the agreement establishes mechanisms for achieving emissions targets, such as emissions trading, that may be a foundation for future agreements.
Perhaps just as important, supporters say, once the protocol takes force, it requires countries to begin looking ahead to follow-on agreements that would have a more significant impact on emissions.
In a statement released following Mr. Putin's signing, Eileen Claussen of the Pew Center on Climate Change noted that talks are set to begin next year on a post-Kyoto agreement. Now that the protocol is in effect, it "sets the stage for a new round of negotiations that can produce a broader, more durable agreement," she said. "New approaches will be needed to better engage the United States and major developing countries in the ... effort."
The new report is likely to add to pressure building on the Bush administration to take firmer actions to curb America's carbon emissions. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has signaled that climate will be one of his top priorities when he takes over as president of the G-8 group of industrial nations in January.
In a recent interview with Reuters, David King, Britain's chief science adviser, noted that during the summer, White House policymakers "fully accepted the scientific arguments for climate change and are keen to play a leadership role. So far we've been focusing on Russia. Clearly now the spotlight is going to move."
President Bush withdrew the US from the Kyoto treaty in 2001. The administration has said it views global warming as a serious threat, but that the Kyoto approach puts too much of the carbon-reduction burden on the US and other industrial countries, putting millions of jobs at risk.
The administration is spending several billion dollars each year to research technologies such as clean-burning coal and hydrogen-fueled cars. And while Bush hasn't signed on to the Kyoto goals, the administration talks of reducing the economy's "carbon-intensity" - the amount of carbon needed to produce each dollar of economic output.
"It is of importance to the president that we continue to make progress" on climate change, EPA administrator Mike Leavitt told the Associated Press Friday.
Sierra Club Global
Warming Page
Includes information on the health hazards of global warming, facts on
SUVs and pollution, vanishing wildlife and habitat and clean energy
alternatives.
Climate Hot Map
A click able map that shows the local effects of climate change around
the world, sponsored by the World Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club, and other
nonprofit environmental groups.
United States Global Change Research
Information Office
The US Global Change Research Information Office (GCRIO) is a
clearinghouse for key documents generated or sponsored by federal
agencies. Many important policy papers generated by the United States
government can be found at their website.
Pew Center on Global Climate Change
The Pew Center's objectives are to educate the public and key policy
makers about the causes and potential consequences of climate change,
and to encourage the domestic and international community to reduce
emissions of greenhouse gases. An independent, nonpartisan organization,
they work with major corporations and release reports on environmental
impacts, economics and policy issues.
American Council for an Energy Efficient
Economy
A nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing energy efficiency as a
means of promoting both economic prosperity and environmental
protection, the ACEEE advises policymakers and educates consumers and
businesses about saving energy and cutting pollution.
Global Climate Coalition
The Global Climate Coalition is "an organization of trade
associations established to coordinate business participation in the
international policy debate on the issue of global climate change and
global warming." This group includes some of the world's most
powerful corporations involved with fossil fuels and has been said to be
a dominant player in undermining U.S. leadership in Kyoto.
National Center for Atmospheric
Research
The NCAR serves as a focus for research on atmospheric and related
science problems makes scientific contributions to understanding the
earth system, including ozone depletion, climate change and severe
storms.
Union of Concerned Scientists
Founded in 1969 by faculty members and students at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology who were concerned about the misuse of science
and technology in society, UCS is an independent nonprofit alliance of
50,000 concerned citizens and scientists across the country who augment
rigorous scientific analysis with citizen advocacy to build a cleaner,
healthier environment and a safer world.
Climate Action Network
The Climate Action Network (CAN) is a global network of over 287 Non-
Governmental Organizations (NGOs) working to promote government and
individual action to limit human-induced climate change to ecologically
sustainable levels. Contains loads of links and resources on key issues
pertaining to climate change.
Goddard Institute for Space Studies
(GISS)
This NASA research institute is one of the world's leading centers for
climate modeling. Its scientists have done pioneering work on such
topics as implications of volcanoes and other producers of sulfate
aerosols on climate, implications of global warming for drought
incidence and severity and implicatoins of climate change for
agricultural productivity and food security.